Remote Sensing投稿经验分享

一、中科院分区

期刊分区,图源Po
JCR一区,中科院二区,影响因子5.347
Remote Sensing投稿经验分享_第1张图片

二、投稿时间经历

写在前面:投稿方向为遥感图像处理

1、3.16日投稿,专栏,pending decision;

注:MDPI下面的文章如果pending decision时间超过两个工作日就会比较危险。

2、3.16日,投稿两小时后转为under review;

3、3.31日,编辑发邮件说找不到审稿人,要求推荐,我就在RS官网找了几个发过去了(感觉没啥用);

4、4.4日,编辑发邮件说找齐三个审稿人;

5、4.20日,major revision大修,要求十天内返回;

6、5.5日修回,因为当时比较忙加上老师出差后被隔离了,耽误点时间,而且我修的不是特别认真,导致后面的悲剧(被拒);

7、5.13 日pending editor decision,这是最后一步,学术编辑掌管生杀大权,可是我被杀了;

8、5.17日Encourage Resubmission after Revisions 拒稿重投,学术编辑意见就是其中一个审稿人意见的细节版本,告知了哪些在大修的时候没改好,应该怎么改,真的感谢;

9、5.30日编辑催稿,询问修改进度,因为课程太忙一直没改;

10、6.14日编辑催稿,还是没改,因为老师太忙;

11、6.16日修回,当天送审,还是原先的审稿人;

12、6.27日major revision大修,当时心里一凉,最后发现全是语法问题;

13、7.1日润色完修回,下午接收,应该没给审稿人看了。

三、审稿时间介绍

官网写着20天,网友反映3-8周,其实还是网友更准,不然像我这种拒稿重投花了三个半月,其实最终官网就显示重投后的15天接收。(我有权怀疑编辑拒稿是因为找审稿人花了太长时间!!所以拒稿缩短整体的时间)

不过其中主要还是自己耽误了太长时间,学业太忙,课程设计堆叠到一起了。

我看了很多分享帖子,一般初审就在一个月以内,加上自己修订与二审,最终能控制在两个月以内。

四、经验分享

1、参考文献格式

MDPI有自己的参考文献格式,很多人可能找不到,可以搜MDPI+EndNote;下面是网址:

MDPI ACS Journals |尾注 (endnote.com)

还有一种方法,搜一篇文章,然后找引用它的文章并且是MDPI出版社的,直接在文章的最后找到别人引用好的复制粘贴就行哈哈哈

2、Cover letter模板

时间

Dr.编辑名字

Editor-in-Chief

期刊名字

Dear Editor:

I wish to submit an original research article for publication in Remote Sensing, titled “******” The paper was coauthored by ****

摘要与重点

Furthermore, because the major focus of our study aligns very well with the aims and scope of your esteemed journal (including *****), we believe that this paper will be of great interest to its wide readership.

Please consider, as potential referees, ______.

This manuscript has not been published or presented elsewhere in part or in entirety and is not under consideration by another journal. We have read and understood your journal’s policies, and we believe that neither the manuscript nor the study violates any of these. There are no conflicts of interest to declare.

Thank you for your consideration. I look forward to hearing from you.

Sincerely,

名字

地址

电话

3、回复审稿人的总结话语

We gratefully thank editor and all reviewers for their time spend making their constructive remarks and useful suggestions, which has significantly raised the quality of the manuscript and has enables us to improve the manuscript. Each suggested revision and comment, brought forward by the reviewers was accurately incorporated and considered. Below the comments of the reviewers are response point by point and the revisions are indicated. And the full text has been revised carefully for another time.

你可能感兴趣的:(论文,Remote,Sensing,MDPI,论文投稿,拒稿重投)